|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Software Vulnerabilities
Phishing |
| |
Overview
VIROGREEN is a sophisticated malware framework employed by the cybercriminal group UNC1860, known for its ability to exploit vulnerabilities in internet-facing systems and provide advanced post-exploitation capabilities. Specifically designed to target SharePoint servers vulnerable to CVE-2019-0604, VIROGREEN allows attackers to gain unauthorized access to affected systems, escalating their control over the network. Unlike traditional malware, which typically communicates directly with external command-and-control (C2) servers, VIROGREEN is a custom-built solution that enables attackers to manage and maintain control of compromised environments with a high degree of flexibility and stealth. This framework’s design not only ensures persistent access but also facilitates the manipulation of compromised systems without raising immediate alarms from security monitoring tools.
The primary strength of
VIROGREEN lies in its post-exploitation features, which include the ability to deploy and manage various backdoors and payloads within the target network. Once the initial compromise is made, VIROGREEN enables attackers to execute commands, upload and download files, and maintain their foothold through several pre-configured post-exploitation tools. These tools include widely known backdoors such as STAYSHANTE and BASEWALK, which can be deployed on targeted machines to ensure long-term persistence. Additionally, VIROGREEN allows attackers to control agents across compromised networks regardless of the method used to implant them, providing an interface that simplifies the management of infected systems.
Targets
Information
Public Administration
How they operate
Once VIROGREEN successfully exploits a vulnerability such as CVE-2019-0604, it can deploy various post-exploitation tools and backdoors, including STAYSHANTE and BASEWALK, which provide attackers with continuous control over compromised systems. These backdoors are capable of executing a wide range of malicious actions, such as uploading or downloading files, executing commands, and conducting reconnaissance within the infected environment. Importantly, VIROGREEN provides attackers with a centralized interface that allows them to control compromised systems regardless of how the implants were originally introduced. This flexibility makes the malware highly adaptable to different attack scenarios, ensuring that once a system is compromised, the attacker can maintain control even if the method of exploitation changes.
A critical component of VIROGREEN’s operation is its ability to function with minimal reliance on traditional command-and-control (C2) infrastructure, which helps to avoid detection by network monitoring tools. Unlike other malware that requires constant communication with external servers, VIROGREEN uses a passive implant approach where the infected system itself can act as a relay or middleman. This allows attackers to send and receive commands without the need for direct outbound communication, which would typically trigger alerts on intrusion detection systems. Instead, VIROGREEN communicates via HTTPS-encrypted traffic, making it harder for defenders to identify malicious activity from network logs.
Furthermore, VIROGREEN’s stealthy communication methods extend to its use of volatile sources for command delivery. Attackers can issue commands from various sources, such as compromised internal systems, VPN nodes, or even other victim networks. This decentralized approach makes it extremely difficult for security teams to trace the origin of the commands or identify patterns of malicious activity. By employing this dynamic command delivery system, VIROGREEN ensures that it can remain active within the target network for extended periods without detection, even as attackers move laterally within the environment.
In addition to passive implants, VIROGREEN is also equipped with advanced defense evasion techniques. The malware includes custom Windows kernel drivers, such as TOFUDRV, which are capable of acting as a “middleman” to filter network traffic. These drivers can intercept and modify data before it reaches the device or application, offering attackers the ability to manipulate or block network traffic in real time. The use of kernel drivers requires a deep understanding of the Windows operating system’s internals and significantly increases the malware’s ability to evade detection by endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions.
The TOFUDRV driver specifically uses undocumented Input/Output Control (IOCTL) commands, which are highly difficult for traditional security tools to detect. This communication method allows the malware to send commands without triggering alarms in security solutions. By bypassing standard security mechanisms, VIROGREEN remains under the radar, even when endpoint security systems are actively scanning for signs of compromise.
Additionally, VIROGREEN makes use of Windows file system filters to further obscure its presence. The malware’s TEMPLEDROP implant, for example, repurposes an Iranian antivirus software driver, known as Sheed AV, to protect critical files and prevent its own detection. By integrating itself into the file system in this way, VIROGREEN can evade detection from file integrity monitoring systems and anti-virus tools, making it harder for defenders to identify compromised machines.
Overall, VIROGREEN’s technical sophistication lies in its ability to combine exploitation, post-exploitation, and stealth in a manner that allows attackers to maintain persistent access to a target network without detection. Its use of custom tools and communication methods ensures that it can infiltrate, control, and manipulate victim systems with a high degree of flexibility. Organizations targeted by VIROGREEN must adopt advanced detection techniques, including monitoring encrypted traffic and anomalous file system behavior, to defend against this complex and evolving threat.
References
