Menu

  • Alerts
  • Incidents
  • News
  • APTs
  • Cyber Decoded
  • Cyber Hygiene
  • Cyber Review
  • Cyber Tips
  • Definitions
  • Malware
  • Threat Actors
  • Tutorials

Useful Tools

  • Password generator
  • Report an incident
  • Report to authorities
No Result
View All Result
CTF Hack Havoc
CyberMaterial
  • Education
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Definitions
  • Information
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
  • Insights
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Tips
    • Tutorials
  • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Report an incident
  • About
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
Get Help
Hall of Hacks
  • Education
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Definitions
  • Information
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
  • Insights
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Tips
    • Tutorials
  • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Report an incident
  • About
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
Get Help
No Result
View All Result
Hall of Hacks
CyberMaterial
No Result
View All Result
Home News

UK Court Denies AI Patenting

December 21, 2023
Reading Time: 2 mins read
in News
UK Court Denies AI Patenting

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be granted patents, affirming that an inventor must be a person or group of persons under existing laws. The case involves Missouri inventor and AI researcher Stephen Thaler, who filed for two patent rights for ideas generated by his AI system, Dabus, in 2018. The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) denied the patent in 2019, arguing that an inventor must be a person. Thaler appealed against the IPO’s decision at the UK Supreme Court, which upheld the denial, stating that Dabus “is not a person, let alone a natural person, and it did not devise any relevant invention.”

The court’s decision is based on the 1977 British Patents Act, which requires applicants to identify any “person or persons” as the inventor. Thaler, while applying for his patents titled “food container” and “devices and methods for attracting enhanced attention,” named his AI system as the sole owner of the patent, stating that he personally was not the inventor. The IPO rejected his applications, arguing that Dabus is not a person and that Thaler was not entitled to apply for the patents by making the AI system the sole owner.

The Supreme Court echoed the IPO’s conclusions and rejected Thaler’s argument that he has property rights in the products of his AI machine, comparing it to a farmer owning the calf birthed by their cow. The court emphasized that existing property law doctrines related to tangible property cannot be applied to “concepts for new and non-obvious devices and methods” generated by AI. The decision highlights the current limitations of patent laws in recognizing AI as an inventor or capable of owning intellectual property, and it suggests that changes may be needed in the future, potentially driven by policymakers rather than the judiciary.

This decision is in line with similar outcomes in the United States, where the Supreme Court declined to hear Thaler’s challenge to a lower court’s ruling that existing statute requires inventors to be natural persons. The legal framework rooted in historical context is seen as a potential hindrance to recognizing AI as an inventor or property owner. As AI technology evolves rapidly, there may be a need for policymakers to address these legal limitations and adapt patent laws to the changing landscape of innovation driven by artificial intelligence.

Reference:
  • UK Supreme Court Rejects AI’s Patent Claim
Tags: Artificial IntelligenceCyber NewsCyber News 2023Cyber RiskCyber threatsCybersecuritycybersecurity developmentDecember 2023UK Supreme Court
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

SAP S4hana Exploited Vulnerability

US Allies Push For Sboms In Security

September 5, 2025
SAP S4hana Exploited Vulnerability

Reward For Russian FSB Hackers

September 5, 2025
SAP S4hana Exploited Vulnerability

US Sues Robot Toy Maker Over Data

September 5, 2025
Google Fined For Cookie Violations

Google Fined For Cookie Violations

September 4, 2025
Google Fined For Cookie Violations

Youtube Cracks Down On Password Sharing

September 4, 2025
Google Fined For Cookie Violations

Moscow Hires Hackers Behind School Breach

September 4, 2025

Latest Alerts

SAP S4hana Exploited Vulnerability

Virustotal Finds Undetected SVG Files

Russian APT28 Deploys Outlook Backdoor

CISA Flags TP Link Router Flaws

Lazarus Hackers Exploit ZeroDay, Deploy Rats

Google Patches 120 Flaws In Android

Subscribe to our newsletter

    Latest Incidents

    North Korean Hackers Fake Interviews

    Bridgestone Confirms Cyberattack

    Cybersecurity Firms Hit By Breach

    Salesloft Drift Attacks Hits Vendors

    Jaguar Land Rover Hit By Cyber Incident

    Hackers Use Grok Ai To Spread Malware

    CyberMaterial Logo
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Jobs
    • Legal and Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    © 2025 | CyberMaterial | All rights reserved

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In

    Add New Playlist

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Definitions
    • Malware
    • Cyber Tips
    • Tutorials
    • Advanced Persistent Threats
    • Threat Actors
    • Report an incident
    • Password Generator
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with us

    Copyright © 2025 CyberMaterial