Meta has recently announced the shutdown of CrowdTangle, a popular tool used by researchers, journalists, and policymakers to track the spread of misinformation on its platforms, Facebook and Instagram. This decision has been met with significant criticism from the affected communities, who argue that CrowdTangle’s replacement, the Meta Content Library, falls short of its predecessor in both features and usability. Many are concerned that this transition comes at a critical time, just months before the U.S. presidential election, a period already fraught with misinformation challenges.
CrowdTangle, acquired by Facebook in 2016, was known for its extensive capabilities in tracking social media engagement and misinformation. The tool allowed users to monitor the spread of content across various pages and groups, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of online misinformation. Critics of Meta’s decision claim that the new Meta Content Library, while offering some data insights, lacks the comprehensive features that made CrowdTangle effective in combating disinformation.
Meta’s president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, defended the move, describing CrowdTangle as a “degrading tool” that provided limited insights into user behavior on Facebook. Clegg argued that the Meta Content Library offers a more comprehensive view by including multimedia data and metrics from various sources, such as Reels and page view counts. However, many researchers argue that CrowdTangle’s detailed tracking and reporting features were vital for understanding the impact of misinformation.
The transition has drawn ire from numerous stakeholders, including Media Matters and other watchdog organizations, who used CrowdTangle to expose misinformation trends and verify claims about platform censorship. As the Meta Content Library rolls out, access remains restricted, leading to concerns that fewer civil society groups will be able to monitor and respond to misinformation effectively during a crucial election year. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between tech companies and those seeking transparency and accountability in the digital age.
Reference:
