Levales Solicitors LLP, a Hampshire law firm specializing in criminal and military law, has come under fire from UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) after a serious data breach exposed sensitive client information due to inadequate security measures. The breach involved hackers accessing the firm’s secure cloud-based server and subsequently publishing the stolen data on the dark web. A total of 8,234 clients were affected, with 863 individuals classified as high-risk due to the sensitive nature of the information, which included names, addresses, national insurance numbers, prisoner numbers, and health statuses.
The ICO’s investigation revealed significant lapses in Levales’ security protocols, particularly the absence of multi-factor authentication (MFA) for critical domain accounts. Instead, the firm relied on basic password management practices, which ultimately led to unauthorized access. The breach occurred when hackers compromised administrator-level credentials, although the exact method of compromise has not been determined. The ICO emphasized that MFA is a fundamental security measure that organizations handling personal data should implement to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of their systems.
Moreover, the investigation highlighted that Levales outsourced its IT management to a third party without adequately reviewing the security measures in place during the time of the incident. The firm had not reassessed the technical measures associated with its contract since it was signed in 2012, further contributing to the vulnerability of its processing systems. The ICO criticized Levales for failing to ensure ongoing security, emphasizing the necessity for organizations to have robust detection, prevention, and monitoring mechanisms in place.
In response to the breach, Levales has taken several remedial actions to strengthen its cybersecurity posture. These measures include the introduction of MFA for all user accounts, updated service contracts with third-party providers, and a comprehensive review of existing systems. Given these proactive steps, the ICO deemed a reprimand appropriate, allowing the firm to continue operations while highlighting the importance of implementing stringent cybersecurity practices. This incident serves as a stark reminder of the vital need for law firms and similar organizations to prioritize data security and protect client information against evolving cyber threats.
Reference:
