Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro claims a Huawei Mate X6, gifted by China’s President Xi Jinping, is “unhackable” by U.S. spies. Security experts disagree, stating no device is truly immune to a nation-state’s capabilities.
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro recently made a bold statement, claiming the Huawei Mate X6 smartphone gifted to him by Chinese President Xi Jinping is “unhackable” by U.S. intelligence agencies. While this is a politically charged assertion, it starkly contrasts the reality of modern cybersecurity. The truth is that no electronic device is truly immune to being compromised, especially when a well-resourced and highly capable adversary, like a nation-state, is the one attempting the hack. These actors possess significant resources, zero-day exploits, and the ability to leverage a variety of attack vectors, making the concept of an “unhackable” phone a security myth.
The Huawei Mate X6 runs on HarmonyOS, Huawei’s proprietary operating system. This tight integration of hardware and software presents a different security model than widely used platforms like Android or iOS. On one hand, this can make the device more difficult for attackers to exploit because the software is closely tied to the hardware. HarmonyOS may utilize proprietary designs, undocumented features, or unique security mechanisms that are less familiar to the public and, therefore, less susceptible to common, off-the-shelf hacking tools. This “security through obscurity” approach can create a higher barrier to entry for many attackers.
Conversely, this closed, proprietary system also introduces unique vulnerabilities. Unlike the open-source nature of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) or the immense global scrutiny of Apple’s iOS, HarmonyOS is a relatively new operating system. It has not undergone the same level of extensive, global security research and public analysis. This lack of scrutiny means the platform is more likely to contain undiscovered implementation errors and design flaws. For sophisticated attackers, particularly government-backed ones, this presents a larger, less-charted attack surface to explore and exploit.
The “unhackable” claim also fails to account for the numerous other potential entry points that exist on any modern smartphone. Hacking a device isn’t just about breaking the operating system; it’s often about finding the weakest link. Attackers can target vulnerabilities in a phone’s baseband modem, the component that handles cellular communications, or exploit flaws in web browsers, Bluetooth stacks, and other software modules. Furthermore, even if an operating system itself is robust, vulnerabilities can exist within third-party apps, allowing a hacker to gain a foothold. This multifaceted attack surface means that no single feature can render a device impenetrable.
The history of cyber-espionage between nation-states, including the U.S. and China, shows that intelligence agencies actively target the technology of their adversaries to find weaknesses. Documents leaked by Edward Snowden, for instance, revealed that the NSA had previously infiltrated Huawei’s systems to learn how its products worked and to identify vulnerabilities for future use. The intelligence community continuously invests in uncovering flaws in a wide range of hardware and software, including devices from major manufacturers like Huawei. Therefore, the assertion that the Huawei Mate X6 is completely secure from U.S. surveillance is a political statement rather than a technical reality.
Reference:
