Menu

  • Alerts
  • Incidents
  • News
  • APTs
  • Cyber Decoded
  • Cyber Hygiene
  • Cyber Review
  • Cyber Tips
  • Definitions
  • Malware
  • Threat Actors
  • Tutorials

Useful Tools

  • Password generator
  • Report an incident
  • Report to authorities
No Result
View All Result
CTF Hack Havoc
CyberMaterial
  • Education
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Definitions
  • Information
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
  • Insights
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Tips
    • Tutorials
  • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Report an incident
  • About
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
Get Help
Hall of Hacks
  • Education
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Definitions
  • Information
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
  • Insights
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Tips
    • Tutorials
  • Support
    • Contact Us
    • Report an incident
  • About
    • About Us
    • Advertise with us
Get Help
No Result
View All Result
Hall of Hacks
CyberMaterial
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Apple Faces Negligence Claims

January 5, 2024
Reading Time: 3 mins read
in News

A San Francisco federal judge has expressed a tentative view that Apple may have been negligent in the design and oversight of its AirTags tracking product, signaling a potential denial of a class-action lawsuit dismissal brought by stalking victims. The judge suggested that the plaintiffs’ claim of negligence under California law was adequately alleged and indicated potential culpability for product liability damages. Apple’s AirTags, designed to locate lost items, have faced criticism for enabling stalking, and the judge opined that Apple should have foreseen this issue, a key element in a negligence claim. The judge also acknowledged the emotional harm suffered by the plaintiffs due to AirTags facilitating stalking, considering it just as valid as physical harm.

The judge pointed out that Apple may have failed to consider the potential for stalking issues with AirTags, despite warnings from various quarters. He noted that the emotional harm inflicted by stalking facilitated by AirTags should be treated seriously under California law. While the judge suggested potential negligence claims, he also indicated uncertainty regarding product liability damages. The judge recognized that the plaintiffs had suffered significant emotional harm due to stalking facilitated by AirTags, emphasizing that emotional injuries should be treated similarly to physical injuries under California law.

The judge, in considering the plaintiffs’ claims, expressed doubt about treating emotional injuries differently from physical injuries and questioned Apple’s responsibility in designing AirTags. Plaintiffs’ lawyer David Slade highlighted the impact of stalking on victims, emphasizing instances where individuals had to alter their lives due to unwanted tracking. The judge indicated that Apple’s AirTags, designed for relatively mundane purposes like finding keys, differ significantly in societal value compared to technologies like cell phones. He also acknowledged the potential misuse of AirTags for serious criminal conduct and the strong public policy in California against individuals becoming victims of stalking.

Apple is facing a class-action lawsuit from stalking victims who allege that the AirTags tracking product empowered their abusers. The judge’s tentative view suggests that Apple may be held responsible for negligence and product liability damages in connection with the AirTags design and oversight.

Reference:
  • DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Tags: AirTagsAppleCyber NewsCyber News 2024Cyber RiskCyber threatsCybersecurityCyberstalkingJanuary 2024USA
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Securonix Buys ThreatQuotient For AI SecOps

WhatsApp Backs Apple In UK Encryption Case

June 13, 2025
Securonix Buys ThreatQuotient For AI SecOps

New NIST Guide Helps Implement Zero Trust

June 13, 2025
Securonix Buys ThreatQuotient For AI SecOps

Securonix Buys ThreatQuotient For AI SecOps

June 13, 2025
New Bill Aims To Secure US Healthcare Data

New Bill Aims To Secure US Healthcare Data

June 13, 2025
New Bill Aims To Secure US Healthcare Data

Operation Secure Busts Infostealer Ring

June 12, 2025
New Bill Aims To Secure US Healthcare Data

Linux Malware Cloud Attacks Surge 388%

June 12, 2025

Latest Alerts

Old Discord Links Now Lead To Malware

VexTrio TDS Uses Adtech To Spread Malware

Simple Typo Breaks AI Safety Via TokenBreak

Coordinated Brute Force Hits Tomcat Manager

SmartAttack Uses Sound To Steal PC Data

Pentest Tool TeamFiltration Hits Entra ID

Subscribe to our newsletter

    Latest Incidents

    Cyberattack On Brussels Parliament Continues

    Swedish Broadcaster SVT Hit By DDoS

    Major Google Cloud Outage Disrupts Web

    AI Spam Hijacks Official US Vaccine Site

    DragonForce Ransomware Hits Philly Schools

    Erie Insurance Cyberattack Halts Operations

    CyberMaterial Logo
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Jobs
    • Legal and Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    © 2025 | CyberMaterial | All rights reserved

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In

    Add New Playlist

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Alerts
    • Incidents
    • News
    • Cyber Decoded
    • Cyber Hygiene
    • Cyber Review
    • Definitions
    • Malware
    • Cyber Tips
    • Tutorials
    • Advanced Persistent Threats
    • Threat Actors
    • Report an incident
    • Password Generator
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with us

    Copyright © 2025 CyberMaterial